Skip to content

Menu

  • Fashion & Shopping
  • Fashion Catalogues
  • Fashion Designer
  • Fashion Clothes
  • Fashion Jeans
  • Fashion Fair
  • About Us
    • Advertise Here
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap

Archives

  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • July 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • January 2017

Calendar

October 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Sep    

Categories

  • Fashion & Shopping
  • Fashion Catalogues
  • Fashion Clothes
  • Fashion Designer
  • Fashion Fair
  • Fashion Jeans
  • Uncategorized

Copyright Mofpb 2026 | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress

Mofpb
  • Fashion & Shopping
  • Fashion Catalogues
  • Fashion Designer
  • Fashion Clothes
  • Fashion Jeans
  • Fashion Fair
  • About Us
    • Advertise Here
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
You are here :
  • Home
  • Fashion & Shopping
  • NCAA must do more for women’s basketball tournament; swag not enough
Written by Theresa M. CostelloMarch 14, 2022

NCAA must do more for women’s basketball tournament; swag not enough

Fashion & Shopping Article

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • You may also like
  • The Future of Fashion Retail: Blending Tech and Trends
  • Stay Chic Without Breaking the Bank: Master the Art of Style Shopping
  • Stitches of Style: How to Turn Thrifted Finds into High-Fashion Statements

Remember this time last year, when there was near-universal outrage directed at the NCAA for its condescending and sexist view of the women’s basketball tournament and the athletes playing in it?

The weight room that wasn’t? The dismal food? The tournament swag that couldn’t have been worse had it been re-gifts?

Keep that energy up. Because while the NCAA will trumpet the steps it has taken toward equity, they are little more than cosmetic measures that could have been done – but weren’t – the minute last year’s tournament ended.

The women’s tournament is now being called “March Madness,” just as the men’s event is. The “March Madness” bracket logo will be plastered all over the women’s tournament, just as it is in the men’s tournament. The size of the women’s field was increased to 68 teams and there will be a First Four, same as the men’s tournament has.

The men’s and women’s players will get the same souvenirs. Each Final Four team will have its own lounge, just as the men have had.

“The work is not done,” Dan Gavitt, the NCAA’s senior vice president of basketball, said. “There is more to do, and we look forward to doing more after this year’s championship.”

And that’s where the continuing outrage comes in.

It is both unacceptable and utterly mind-boggling that, almost 50 years after Title IX became law, the NCAA could have been so dismissive of its women athletes. Oh, NCAA president Mark Emmert offered all kinds of excuses last year – COVID, there wasn’t enough room for a weight room and/or one was going to be set up later, more COVID – but every single one of them was worse than the next.

The bottom line was that Emmert and the NCAA had simply never cared enough to do a comparison to see if the women were being short-changed. They put all their efforts and energies into the cash cow that is the men’s tournament and figured whatever they did for the women would be good enough.

You could almost hear Emmert and the rest of the suits in Indianapolis muttering under their breath, “What are those girls griping about? They should be grateful they even have a tournament.”

SELECTION SUNDAY:March Madness brackets revealed for men’s, women’s tournaments

PLAY OUR NCAA BRACKET GAME: Make your picks, compete vs. friends

SPORTS NEWSLETTER: Sign up now for sports updates sent to your inbox

But this is what Emmert and Co., not to mention the executives at the various media companies, have missed. While it should be enough to treat women equally simply because it’s the right thing to do, failing to do so is costing the NCAA, TV networks and sponsors.

A lot. A LOT a lot.

While CBS pays the NCAA billions for the broadcast rights to the men’s tournament, the NCAA threw the rights to the women’s tournament into a package of two dozen championships. Because who would imagine that anyone would watch the marquee event in women’s college athletics, let alone pay for the rights to air it, right?

But as anyone who has been paying attention to ratings – or attendance or sponsorships or jersey sales – could tell you, women’s sports is where the money is right now. Ratings for last year’s tournament skyrocketed, with the Baylor-UConn game in the Elite Eight drawing 1.7 million viewers alone.

This despite going head-to-head against the men’s tournament.

In early February, average viewership for women’s college basketball was up 46 percent over 2021. The women’s Big Ten tournament in Indianapolis set a record for attendance, and its TV ratings were up 76 percent.

No, that’s not a misprint. 76 percent.

But hey! The girls got a new logo and better swag so we’re all good, right?

The misogynistic keyboard warriors will no doubt howl at even the suggestion that the women deserve equal treatment, claiming the NCAA is only prioritizing what makes money. Ignoring the fact that the women’s tournament might be bringing in billions, too, had the NCAA marketed it and promoted it like it has the men’s tournament rather than treating it, at best, like an afterthought.

Anyone who watched last year’s tournament, or has tuned in this season, knows that the women’s game is every bit as exciting, competitive and compelling as the men’s game. There are tremendous individual players, entertaining rivalries and intriguing storylines, just as there are in the men’s bracket. 

Treating the women as equal players, in March and beyond, is long overdue. The changes the NCAA has made are a good start, but that’s all they are. 

A start. 

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour @nrarmour

You may also like

The Future of Fashion Retail: Blending Tech and Trends

Stay Chic Without Breaking the Bank: Master the Art of Style Shopping

Stitches of Style: How to Turn Thrifted Finds into High-Fashion Statements

Tags: Womens

Categories

  • Fashion & Shopping
  • Fashion Catalogues
  • Fashion Clothes
  • Fashion Designer
  • Fashion Fair
  • Fashion Jeans
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Recent Posts

  • The Future of Fashion Retail: Blending Tech and Trends
  • The Mysteries Beyond Categories: Navigating the Uncategorized
  • 2024’s Boldest Fashion Design Ideas That Will Steal the Spotlight
  • Fashion Fusion: Where Style Meets Storytelling
  • Denim Dreams: Weaving Style, History, and Bold Statements from the Runway to the Sidewalk

BL

mofpb.co.uk | Theme by ThemeinProgress | Proudly powered by WordPress

WhatsApp us